Cambro PCU1000HH615vsHatco FSHC-7W1-EE
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Cambro PCU1000HH615
Internal Volume
8.1cu ft
Max Idle Rate
174W
Energy Usage
115W
Doors
2
Hatco FSHC-7W1-EE
Internal Volume
8.3cu ft
Max Idle Rate
178W
Energy Usage
160W
Doors
1
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on idle: 174 vs 178 W. The Hatco FSHC-7W1-EE is larger at 8.3 cu ft versus 8.1 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Cambro | Hatco |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Cambro | Hatco |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 115 | 160 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 174 | 178 |