Cambro PCU1000HH615vsMetro C543-ASFS-U-A
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Cambro PCU1000HH615
Internal Volume
8.1cu ft
Max Idle Rate
174W
Energy Usage
115W
Doors
2
Metro C543-ASFS-U-A
Internal Volume
7.8cu ft
Max Idle Rate
168W
Energy Usage
152W
Doors
1
Key differences
Metro C543-ASFS-U-A is 3% more efficient at 168 W versus 174 W for the Cambro PCU1000HH615. The Cambro PCU1000HH615 is larger at 8.1 cu ft versus 7.8 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Cambro | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Cambro | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 115 | 152 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 174 | 168 |