Cambro PCU1600HH615vsTurbo Air PRO-15H-G
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Cambro PCU1600HH615
Internal Volume
12.4cu ft
Max Idle Rate
267W
Energy Usage
117W
Doors
2
Turbo Air PRO-15H-G
Internal Volume
14cu ft
Max Idle Rate
283W
Energy Usage
159W
Doors
1
Key differences
Cambro PCU1600HH615 is 6% more efficient at 267 W versus 283 W for the Turbo Air PRO-15H-G. The Turbo Air PRO-15H-G is larger at 14 cu ft versus 12.4 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Cambro | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 12.4 | 14 |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Transparent |
Energy
| Spec | Cambro | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 117 | 159 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 267 | 283 |