SpecDirectory

Continental 2RNvsEverest Refrigeration EMGR48

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Continental 2RN

Total Volume

43.5cu ft

Daily Energy

1.97kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

46 × 26.5 × 59.3in

Everest Refrigeration EMGR48

Total Volume

43.3cu ft

Daily Energy

3.63kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

53.1 × 30.8 × 80.1in

Key differences

Continental 2RN is 46% more efficient at 1.97 kWh/day versus 3.63 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration EMGR48. The Continental 2RN is larger at 43.5 cu ft versus 43.3 cu ft.

Dimensions

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Height(in)59.2580.13
Width(in)4653.13
Depth(in)26.5030.75

Capacity

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Total Volume(cu ft)43.543.3
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors22
Transparent Doors02
Solid Doors20
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedSliding

Efficiency

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)1.973.63
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic

Refrigerant

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
TypeR-290R-290
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecContinentalEverest Refrigeration
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorVertical Transparent Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionReach-inReach-in

More comparisons