SpecDirectory

Everest Refrigeration ETBR1vsHUBERT 92900

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Everest Refrigeration ETBR1

Total Volume

6.1cu ft

Daily Energy

0.96kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

27.8 × 31.5 × 30.3in

HUBERT 92900

Total Volume

6cu ft

Daily Energy

0.49kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-600a

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

38.4 × 17.1 × 39.5in

Key differences

HUBERT 92900 is 49% more efficient at 0.49 kWh/day versus 0.96 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ETBR1. The Everest Refrigeration ETBR1 is larger at 6.1 cu ft versus 6 cu ft. HUBERT 92900 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-600a (GWP 3) versus R-290 (GWP 3). Overall, the Everest Refrigeration ETBR1 sits higher in the category, ranking above 18% of certified commercial refrigerators & freezers.

Dimensions

SpecEverest RefrigerationHUBERT
Height(in)30.2539.50
Width(in)27.7538.40
Depth(in)31.5017.10

Capacity

SpecEverest RefrigerationHUBERT
Total Volume(cu ft)6.16
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors11
Transparent Doors00
Solid Doors11
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecEverest RefrigerationHUBERT
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)0.960.49
Defrost TypeAutomaticManual

Refrigerant

SpecEverest RefrigerationHUBERT
TypeR-290R-600a
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecEverest RefrigerationHUBERT
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorVertical Solid Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionUnder-counter UnitMilk Cooler

More comparisons