SpecDirectory

Everest Refrigeration ETBR1vsTurbo Air MUR-28L-N6

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Everest Refrigeration ETBR1

Total Volume

6.1cu ft

Daily Energy

0.96kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

27.8 × 31.5 × 30.3in

Turbo Air MUR-28L-N6

Total Volume

6.2cu ft

Daily Energy

0.80kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-600a

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

27.5 × 30 × 31in

Key differences

Turbo Air MUR-28L-N6 is 17% more efficient at 0.80 kWh/day versus 0.96 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ETBR1. The Turbo Air MUR-28L-N6 is larger at 6.2 cu ft versus 6.1 cu ft. Turbo Air MUR-28L-N6 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-600a (GWP 3) versus R-290 (GWP 3).

Dimensions

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Height(in)30.2530.98
Width(in)27.7527.48
Depth(in)31.5030

Capacity

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Total Volume(cu ft)6.16.2
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors11
Transparent Doors00
Solid Doors11
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)0.960.80
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic

Refrigerant

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
TypeR-290R-600a
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorVertical Solid Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionUnder-counter UnitReach-in

More comparisons