Everest Refrigeration ETBSR2vsTurbo Air MUR-36L-N6
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Everest Refrigeration ETBSR2
Total Volume
8.3cu ft
Daily Energy
1.02kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
35.6 × 31.5 × 30.3in
Turbo Air MUR-36L-N6
Total Volume
8.4cu ft
Daily Energy
0.85kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-600a
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
36.3 × 30 × 31in
Key differences
Turbo Air MUR-36L-N6 is 17% more efficient at 0.85 kWh/day versus 1.02 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ETBSR2. The Turbo Air MUR-36L-N6 is larger at 8.4 cu ft versus 8.3 cu ft. Turbo Air MUR-36L-N6 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-600a (GWP 3) versus R-290 (GWP 3).
Dimensions
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 30.25 | 30.98 |
| Width(in) | 35.63 | 36.34 |
| Depth(in) | 31.50 | 30 |
Capacity
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 0 |
| Solid Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 1.02 | 0.85 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-600a |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Reach-in | Reach-in |