Everest Refrigeration ETBSR2vsVictory VWR36HC*********
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Everest Refrigeration ETBSR2
Total Volume
8.3cu ft
Daily Energy
1.02kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
35.6 × 31.5 × 30.3in
Victory VWR36HC*********
Total Volume
8.2cu ft
Daily Energy
0.75kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
36 × 27.3 × 34.5in
Key differences
Victory VWR36HC********* is 26% more efficient at 0.75 kWh/day versus 1.02 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ETBSR2. The Everest Refrigeration ETBSR2 is larger at 8.3 cu ft versus 8.2 cu ft. Overall, the Everest Refrigeration ETBSR2 sits higher in the category, ranking above 19% of certified commercial refrigerators & freezers.
Dimensions
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Victory |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 30.25 | 34.50 |
| Width(in) | 35.63 | 36 |
| Depth(in) | 31.50 | 27.25 |
Capacity
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Victory |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 0 |
| Solid Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Victory |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 1.02 | 0.75 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Victory |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Victory |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Reach-in | Under-counter Unit |