Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2vsHoshizaki America, Inc. UR60B
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2
Total Volume
15.3cu ft
Daily Energy
1.21kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
59 × 28 × 22in
Hoshizaki America, Inc. UR60B
Total Volume
15.1cu ft
Daily Energy
0.94kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
60 × 30 × 34in
Key differences
Hoshizaki America, Inc. UR60B is 22% more efficient at 0.94 kWh/day versus 1.21 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2. The Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2 is larger at 15.3 cu ft versus 15.1 cu ft. Overall, the Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2 sits higher in the category, ranking above 36% of certified commercial refrigerators & freezers.
Dimensions
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Hoshizaki America, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 22 | 34 |
| Width(in) | 59 | 60 |
| Depth(in) | 28 | 30 |
Capacity
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Hoshizaki America, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 15.3 | 15.1 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 0 |
| Solid Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Hoshizaki America, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 1.21 | 0.94 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Hoshizaki America, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Hoshizaki America, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Reach-in | Under-counter Unit |