Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2vsTurbo Air JUR-72S-N6
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2
Total Volume
15.3cu ft
Daily Energy
1.21kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
59 × 28 × 22in
Turbo Air JUR-72S-N6
Total Volume
15.2cu ft
Daily Energy
1.09kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-600a
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
70.9 × 23.6 × 31.5in
Key differences
Turbo Air JUR-72S-N6 is 10% more efficient at 1.09 kWh/day versus 1.21 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2. The Everest Refrigeration ETBWR2 is larger at 15.3 cu ft versus 15.2 cu ft. Turbo Air JUR-72S-N6 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-600a (GWP 3) versus R-290 (GWP 3).
Dimensions
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 22 | 31.50 |
| Width(in) | 59 | 70.87 |
| Depth(in) | 28 | 23.62 |
Capacity
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 15.3 | 15.2 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 0 |
| Solid Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 1.21 | 1.09 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-600a |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Reach-in | Reach-in |