SpecDirectory

Everest Refrigeration ETR2-24vsTurbo Air JUR-48S-N6

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Everest Refrigeration ETR2-24

Total Volume

8.4cu ft

Daily Energy

1.02kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

21 × 29 × 47in

Turbo Air JUR-48S-N6

Total Volume

8.3cu ft

Daily Energy

0.90kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-600a

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

47.2 × 23.6 × 31.5in

Key differences

Turbo Air JUR-48S-N6 is 12% more efficient at 0.90 kWh/day versus 1.02 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ETR2-24. The Everest Refrigeration ETR2-24 is larger at 8.4 cu ft versus 8.3 cu ft. Turbo Air JUR-48S-N6 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-600a (GWP 3) versus R-290 (GWP 3).

Dimensions

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Height(in)4731.50
Width(in)2147.24
Depth(in)2923.62

Capacity

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Total Volume(cu ft)8.48.3
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors22
Transparent Doors00
Solid Doors22
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)1.020.90
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic

Refrigerant

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
TypeR-290R-600a
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorVertical Solid Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionReach-inReach-in

More comparisons