Follett C1414AvsHoshizaki KMS-1122MLJ
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Follett C1414A
Harvest Rate
1107lb/day
Energy Use
4.53kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Hoshizaki KMS-1122MLJ
Harvest Rate
1100lb/day
Energy Use
4.05kWh/100 lb
Water Use
16gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
Key differences
Hoshizaki KMS-1122MLJ is 11% more efficient at 4.05 kWh/100 lb versus 4.53 kWh/100 lb for the Follett C1414A. The Follett C1414A is larger at 1107 lb/day versus 1100 lb/day. Follett C1414A uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | Follett | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 1107 | 1100 |
| Ice Type | Continuous | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Ice Making Head | Remote Condensing Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 89.70 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Follett | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 4.53 | 4.05 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12 | 16 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Follett | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-404A |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-404A (GWP:3920) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Follett | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | — | SRK-12J3 |