Follett HCF1010RBSvsIce-O-Matic CIM0826HR
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Follett HCF1010RBS
Harvest Rate
770lb/day
Energy Use
3.88kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
Ice-O-Matic CIM0826HR
Harvest Rate
769lb/day
Energy Use
4.80kWh/100 lb
Water Use
19gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
Key differences
Follett HCF1010RBS is 19% more efficient at 3.88 kWh/100 lb versus 4.80 kWh/100 lb for the Ice-O-Matic CIM0826HR. The Follett HCF1010RBS is larger at 770 lb/day versus 769 lb/day. Overall, the Ice-O-Matic CIM0826HR sits higher in the category, ranking above 88% of certified commercial ice machines.
Production
| Spec | Follett | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 770 | 769 |
| Ice Type | Continuous | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Remote Condensing Unit | Remote Condensing Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 90.20 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Follett | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 3.88 | 4.80 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12 | 19 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Follett | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-404A | R-404A |
| GWP Rating | R-404A (GWP:3920) | R-404A (GWP:3920) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Follett | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | AWA9490ZXTPN | RCA2061 |