Follett HCF1010RBSvsICETRO IM-1105-AC
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Follett HCF1010RBS
Harvest Rate
770lb/day
Energy Use
3.88kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
ICETRO IM-1105-AC
Harvest Rate
775lb/day
Energy Use
4.52kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12.1gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-449A
GWP 1400 · Higher
Key differences
Follett HCF1010RBS is 14% more efficient at 3.88 kWh/100 lb versus 4.52 kWh/100 lb for the ICETRO IM-1105-AC. The ICETRO IM-1105-AC is larger at 775 lb/day versus 770 lb/day. ICETRO IM-1105-AC uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-449A (GWP 1400) versus R-404A (GWP 3920). Overall, the ICETRO IM-1105-AC sits higher in the category, ranking above 13% of certified commercial ice machines.
Production
| Spec | Follett | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 770 | 775 |
| Ice Type | Continuous | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Remote Condensing Unit | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 90.20 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Follett | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 3.88 | 4.52 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12 | 12.1 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Follett | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-404A | R-449A |
| GWP Rating | R-404A (GWP:3920) | R-449A (GWP:1400) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Follett | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | AWA9490ZXTPN | — |