Hoshizaki IM-200BAKvsScotsman UF2020A-1A
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Hoshizaki IM-200BAK
Harvest Rate
150lb/day
Energy Use
6.50kWh/100 lb
Water Use
23gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Scotsman UF2020A-1A
Harvest Rate
149lb/day
Energy Use
6.46kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-134a
GWP 1430 · Higher
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on energy: 6.50 vs 6.46 kWh/100 lb. The Hoshizaki IM-200BAK is larger at 150 lb/day versus 149 lb/day. Hoshizaki IM-200BAK uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-134a (GWP 1430).
Production
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 150 | 149 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Continuous |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 64.25 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 6.50 | 6.46 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 23 | 12 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-134a |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-134a (GWP:1430) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |