Hoshizaki KM-116BAKvsKoolaire KYP0150A-161B
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Hoshizaki KM-116BAK
Harvest Rate
110lb/day
Energy Use
5.20kWh/100 lb
Water Use
20gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Koolaire KYP0150A-161B
Harvest Rate
112lb/day
Energy Use
7.30kWh/100 lb
Water Use
17.1gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Key differences
Hoshizaki KM-116BAK is 29% more efficient at 5.20 kWh/100 lb versus 7.30 kWh/100 lb for the Koolaire KYP0150A-161B. The Koolaire KYP0150A-161B is larger at 112 lb/day versus 110 lb/day.
Production
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Koolaire |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 110 | 112 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Koolaire |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.20 | 7.30 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 20 | 17.1 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Koolaire |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Koolaire |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |