Hoshizaki KM-116BAKvsScotsman UF1415A-1A
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Hoshizaki KM-116BAK
Harvest Rate
110lb/day
Energy Use
5.20kWh/100 lb
Water Use
20gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Scotsman UF1415A-1A
Harvest Rate
107lb/day
Energy Use
7.48kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-134a
GWP 1430 · Higher
Key differences
Hoshizaki KM-116BAK is 30% more efficient at 5.20 kWh/100 lb versus 7.48 kWh/100 lb for the Scotsman UF1415A-1A. The Hoshizaki KM-116BAK is larger at 110 lb/day versus 107 lb/day. Hoshizaki KM-116BAK uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-134a (GWP 1430).
Production
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 110 | 107 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Continuous |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 62.97 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.20 | 7.48 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 20 | 12 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-134a |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-134a (GWP:1430) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Scotsman |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |