Hoshizaki KM-1601SRJvsICETRO IM-1700-RC
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Hoshizaki KM-1601SRJ
Harvest Rate
1600lb/day
Energy Use
3.96kWh/100 lb
Water Use
17.6gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
ICETRO IM-1700-RC
Harvest Rate
1575lb/day
Energy Use
3.51kWh/100 lb
Water Use
13.4gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R-410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
ICETRO IM-1700-RC is 11% more efficient at 3.51 kWh/100 lb versus 3.96 kWh/100 lb for the Hoshizaki KM-1601SRJ. The Hoshizaki KM-1601SRJ is larger at 1600 lb/day versus 1575 lb/day. ICETRO IM-1700-RC uses a lower-impact refrigerant: Other, R-410A (GWP 2088) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | Hoshizaki | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 1600 | 1575 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Remote Condensing Unit | Remote Condensing Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Hoshizaki | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 3.96 | 3.51 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 17.6 | 13.4 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Hoshizaki | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-404A | Other, R-410A |
| GWP Rating | R-404A (GWP:3920) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Hoshizaki | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | URC-22F | ICR-2000 |