ICETRO IM-1700-RCvsManitowoc IYT1830C-161X
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
ICETRO IM-1700-RC
Harvest Rate
1575lb/day
Energy Use
3.51kWh/100 lb
Water Use
13.4gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R-410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Manitowoc IYT1830C-161X
Harvest Rate
1560lb/day
Energy Use
4.02kWh/100 lb
Water Use
18.5gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
ICETRO IM-1700-RC is 13% more efficient at 3.51 kWh/100 lb versus 4.02 kWh/100 lb for the Manitowoc IYT1830C-161X. The ICETRO IM-1700-RC is larger at 1575 lb/day versus 1560 lb/day. Manitowoc IYT1830C-161X uses a lower-impact refrigerant: Other, R410A (GWP 2088) versus Other, R-410A (GWP 2088).
Production
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 1575 | 1560 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Remote Condensing Unit | Remote Condensing Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 3.51 | 4.02 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 13.4 | 18.5 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Other, R-410A | Other, R410A |
| GWP Rating | R-410A (GWP:2088) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | ICR-2000 | CVDT1800-263Q |