Hoshizaki KM-1900SRJZ3vsManitowoc IYT1900N-261E
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Hoshizaki KM-1900SRJZ3
Harvest Rate
1700lb/day
Energy Use
3.90kWh/100 lb
Water Use
19gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
Manitowoc IYT1900N-261E
Harvest Rate
1744lb/day
Energy Use
4kWh/100 lb
Water Use
20gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
Other, R410A
GWP 2088 · Higher
Key differences
Hoshizaki KM-1900SRJZ3 is 3% more efficient at 3.90 kWh/100 lb versus 4.00 kWh/100 lb for the Manitowoc IYT1900N-261E. The Manitowoc IYT1900N-261E is larger at 1744 lb/day versus 1700 lb/day. Manitowoc IYT1900N-261E uses a lower-impact refrigerant: Other, R410A (GWP 2088) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 1700 | 1744 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Remote Condensing Unit | Remote Condensing Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 3.90 | 4 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 19 | 20 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-404A | Other, R410A |
| GWP Rating | R-404A (GWP:3920) | R-410A (GWP:2088) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Hoshizaki | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | URC-22FZ | JCT1500-261 |