Ice-O-Matic CIM0836HR*SvsICETRO IM-1105-AC
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
Ice-O-Matic CIM0836HR*S
Harvest Rate
769lb/day
Energy Use
4.80kWh/100 lb
Water Use
19gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
ICETRO IM-1105-AC
Harvest Rate
775lb/day
Energy Use
4.52kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12.1gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-449A
GWP 1400 · Higher
Key differences
ICETRO IM-1105-AC is 6% more efficient at 4.52 kWh/100 lb versus 4.80 kWh/100 lb for the Ice-O-Matic CIM0836HR*S. The ICETRO IM-1105-AC is larger at 775 lb/day versus 769 lb/day. ICETRO IM-1105-AC uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-449A (GWP 1400) versus R-404A (GWP 3920). Overall, the Ice-O-Matic CIM0836HR*S sits higher in the category, ranking above 88% of certified commercial ice machines.
Production
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 769 | 775 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Remote Condensing Unit | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 4.80 | 4.52 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 19 | 12.1 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-404A | R-449A |
| GWP Rating | R-404A (GWP:3920) | R-449A (GWP:1400) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Ice-O-Matic | ICETRO |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |
| Condenser Model | RCA2061 | — |