ICETRO IM-1105-ACvsManitowoc IYP1000A-261
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
ICETRO IM-1105-AC
Harvest Rate
775lb/day
Energy Use
4.52kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12.1gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-449A
GWP 1400 · Higher
Manitowoc IYP1000A-261
Harvest Rate
781lb/day
Energy Use
4.30kWh/100 lb
Water Use
13.7gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Key differences
Manitowoc IYP1000A-261 is 5% more efficient at 4.30 kWh/100 lb versus 4.52 kWh/100 lb for the ICETRO IM-1105-AC. The Manitowoc IYP1000A-261 is larger at 781 lb/day versus 775 lb/day. Manitowoc IYP1000A-261 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-449A (GWP 1400).
Production
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 775 | 781 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Ice Making Head | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 100 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 4.52 | 4.30 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 12.1 | 13.7 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-449A | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-449A (GWP:1400) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ICETRO | Manitowoc |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |