SpecDirectory

Kenmore 405.75625421vsSamsung RF29A9675**

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Kenmore 405.75625421

Capacity

28.9cu ft

Annual Energy

743kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

36 × 70in (w × h)

Samsung RF29A9675**

Capacity

29cu ft

Annual Energy

704kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

5%

Dimensions

35.9 × 73in (w × h)

Key differences

Samsung RF29A9675** is 5% more efficient at 704 kWh/yr versus 743 kWh/yr for the Kenmore 405.75625421. The Samsung RF29A9675** is larger at 29 cu ft versus 28.9 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Total Volume(cu ft)28.929
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)36.837.8

Dimensions

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Height(in)7073
Width(in)3635.9

Energy

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)743704
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)816736
Better Than Standard(%)105
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecKenmoreSamsung
TypeBottom FreezerBottom Freezer
Product Class5A - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service5I - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InNoNo
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerYesYes
Through-the-Door DispenserYesNo

Refrigerant

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Type—R-600a
GWP Rating—R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Connectivity

SpecKenmoreSamsung
ConnectedNoYes
Connects Using—Wi-Fi
Communication Standard—Smart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.x

More comparisons