SpecDirectory

Kenmore 405.75625421vsSamsung RF29BB8600**

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Kenmore 405.75625421

Capacity

28.9cu ft

Annual Energy

743kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

36 × 70in (w × h)

Samsung RF29BB8600**

Capacity

28.8cu ft

Annual Energy

685kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

5%

Dimensions

35.8 × 70in (w × h)

Key differences

Samsung RF29BB8600** is 8% more efficient at 685 kWh/yr versus 743 kWh/yr for the Kenmore 405.75625421. The Kenmore 405.75625421 is larger at 28.9 cu ft versus 28.8 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Total Volume(cu ft)28.928.8
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)36.835.6

Dimensions

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Height(in)7070
Width(in)3635.8

Energy

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)743685
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)816716
Better Than Standard(%)105
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecKenmoreSamsung
TypeBottom FreezerBottom Freezer
Product Class5A - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service5I - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InNoNo
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerYesYes
Through-the-Door DispenserYesNo

Refrigerant

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Type—R-600a
GWP Rating—R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Connectivity

SpecKenmoreSamsung
ConnectedNoYes
Connects Using—Wi-Fi
Communication Standard—Smart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.x

More comparisons