SpecDirectory

Kenmore 46-75625vsSamsung RF29BB8600**

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Kenmore 46-75625

Capacity

28.9cu ft

Annual Energy

743kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

36 × 70in (w × h)

Samsung RF29BB8600**

Capacity

28.8cu ft

Annual Energy

685kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

5%

Dimensions

35.8 × 70in (w × h)

Key differences

Samsung RF29BB8600** is 8% more efficient at 685 kWh/yr versus 743 kWh/yr for the Kenmore 46-75625. The Kenmore 46-75625 is larger at 28.9 cu ft versus 28.8 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Total Volume(cu ft)28.928.8
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)36.835.6

Dimensions

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Height(in)7070
Width(in)3635.8

Energy

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)743685
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)816716
Better Than Standard(%)105
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecKenmoreSamsung
TypeBottom FreezerBottom Freezer
Product Class5A - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service5I - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InNoNo
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerYesYes
Through-the-Door DispenserYesNo

Refrigerant

SpecKenmoreSamsung
Type—R-600a
GWP Rating—R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Connectivity

SpecKenmoreSamsung
ConnectedNoYes
Connects Using—Wi-Fi
Communication Standard—Smart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.x

More comparisons