KitchenAid KRMF436SJPvsSamsung RF29A9675**
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
KitchenAid KRMF436SJP
Capacity
28.9cu ft
Annual Energy
733kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
10%
Dimensions
39 × 71in (w × h)
Samsung RF29A9675**
Capacity
29cu ft
Annual Energy
704kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
5%
Dimensions
35.9 × 73in (w × h)
Key differences
Samsung RF29A9675** is 4% more efficient at 704 kWh/yr versus 733 kWh/yr for the KitchenAid KRMF436SJP. The Samsung RF29A9675** is larger at 29 cu ft versus 28.9 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | KitchenAid | Samsung |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 28.9 | 29 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 35.7 | 37.8 |
Dimensions
| Spec | KitchenAid | Samsung |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 71 | 73 |
| Width(in) | 39 | 35.9 |
Energy
| Spec | KitchenAid | Samsung |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 733 | 704 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 806 | 736 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 10 | 5 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | KitchenAid | Samsung |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Bottom Freezer | Bottom Freezer |
| Product Class | 5A - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service | 5I - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Counter Depth | No | No |
| Built In | No | No |
| Compact | No | No |
| Ice Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Through-the-Door Dispenser | Yes | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | KitchenAid | Samsung |
|---|---|---|
| Type | — | R-600a |
| GWP Rating | — | R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | KitchenAid | Samsung |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | Yes |
| Connects Using | — | Wi-Fi |
| Communication Standard | — | Smart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.x |