SpecDirectory

Samsung RF29A9675**vsWhirlpool WRMF3536SV

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Samsung RF29A9675**

Capacity

29cu ft

Annual Energy

704kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

5%

Dimensions

35.9 × 73in (w × h)

Whirlpool WRMF3536SV

Capacity

28.9cu ft

Annual Energy

733kWh/yr

Better Than Standard

10%

Dimensions

39 × 71in (w × h)

Key differences

Samsung RF29A9675** is 4% more efficient at 704 kWh/yr versus 733 kWh/yr for the Whirlpool WRMF3536SV. The Samsung RF29A9675** is larger at 29 cu ft versus 28.9 cu ft.

Capacity

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Total Volume(cu ft)2928.9
Adjusted Volume(cu ft)37.835.7

Dimensions

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Height(in)7371
Width(in)35.939

Energy

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr)704733
US Federal Standard(kWh/yr)736806
Better Than Standard(%)510
Most EfficientNoNo

Configuration

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
TypeBottom FreezerBottom Freezer
Product Class5I - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with an automatic icemaker without through-the-door ice service5A - Refrigerator-freezers - automatic defrost with bottom-mounted freezer with through-the-door ice service
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic
Counter DepthNoNo
Built InNoNo
CompactNoNo
Ice MakerYesYes
Through-the-Door DispenserNoYes

Refrigerant

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
TypeR-600a—
GWP RatingR-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)—

Connectivity

SpecSamsungWhirlpool
ConnectedYesNo
Connects UsingWi-Fi—
Communication StandardSmart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.x—

More comparisons