SpecDirectory

Everest Refrigeration ETBR3vsTraulsen RHT126WUT-FHS

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Everest Refrigeration ETBR3

Total Volume

18.5cu ft

Daily Energy

1.37kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

71.1 × 31.5 × 30.3in

Traulsen RHT126WUT-FHS

Total Volume

18.4cu ft

Daily Energy

1.31kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

29.9 × 29 × 83.3in

Key differences

Traulsen RHT126WUT-FHS is 4% more efficient at 1.31 kWh/day versus 1.37 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ETBR3. The Everest Refrigeration ETBR3 is larger at 18.5 cu ft versus 18.4 cu ft.

Dimensions

SpecEverest RefrigerationTraulsen
Height(in)30.2583.25
Width(in)71.1329.88
Depth(in)31.5029

Capacity

SpecEverest RefrigerationTraulsen
Total Volume(cu ft)18.518.4
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors31
Transparent Doors00
Solid Doors31
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecEverest RefrigerationTraulsen
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)1.371.31
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic

Refrigerant

SpecEverest RefrigerationTraulsen
TypeR-290R-290
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecEverest RefrigerationTraulsen
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorVertical Solid Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionReach-inReach-in

More comparisons