Everest Refrigeration ETBR3vsTurbo Air M3F19-1-N
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
Everest Refrigeration ETBR3
Total Volume
18.5cu ft
Daily Energy
1.37kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
71.1 × 31.5 × 30.3in
Turbo Air M3F19-1-N
Total Volume
18.4cu ft
Daily Energy
3.78kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
25.2 × 31.5 × 72in
Key differences
Everest Refrigeration ETBR3 is 64% more efficient at 1.37 kWh/day versus 3.78 kWh/day for the Turbo Air M3F19-1-N. The Everest Refrigeration ETBR3 is larger at 18.5 cu ft versus 18.4 cu ft. Overall, the Turbo Air M3F19-1-N sits higher in the category, ranking above 80% of certified commercial refrigerators & freezers.
Dimensions
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 30.25 | 72.05 |
| Width(in) | 71.13 | 25.20 |
| Depth(in) | 31.50 | 31.50 |
Capacity
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 18.5 | 18.4 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 3 | 1 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 0 |
| Solid Doors | 3 | 1 |
| Drawers | 0 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Hinged | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 1.37 | 3.78 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | Everest Refrigeration | Turbo Air |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Vertical Solid Door Refrigerator | Vertical Solid Door Freezer |
| Orientation | Vertical | Vertical |
| Description | Reach-in | Reach-in |