SpecDirectory

Everest Refrigeration ETBR3vsTurbo Air M3R19-1-N6

Side-by-side refrigerator comparison

Everest Refrigeration ETBR3

Total Volume

18.5cu ft

Daily Energy

1.37kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

71.1 × 31.5 × 30.3in

Turbo Air M3R19-1-N6

Total Volume

18.4cu ft

Daily Energy

1.26kWh/day

Refrigerant

R-600a

GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions

25.2 × 31.5 × 72in

Key differences

Turbo Air M3R19-1-N6 is 8% more efficient at 1.26 kWh/day versus 1.37 kWh/day for the Everest Refrigeration ETBR3. The Everest Refrigeration ETBR3 is larger at 18.5 cu ft versus 18.4 cu ft. Turbo Air M3R19-1-N6 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-600a (GWP 3) versus R-290 (GWP 3).

Dimensions

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Height(in)30.2572.05
Width(in)71.1325.20
Depth(in)31.5031.50

Capacity

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Total Volume(cu ft)18.518.4
Display Area(sq ft)00
Doors31
Transparent Doors00
Solid Doors31
Drawers00
Door OrientationHingedHinged

Efficiency

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day)1.371.26
Defrost TypeAutomaticAutomatic

Refrigerant

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
TypeR-290R-600a
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-600a (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

Classification

SpecEverest RefrigerationTurbo Air
Product TypeVertical Solid Door RefrigeratorVertical Solid Door Refrigerator
OrientationVerticalVertical
DescriptionReach-inReach-in

More comparisons